Die Zeit nach Erteilung des KWS - Führen oder nicht führen?

Zitat von Grün

@ Gabor VASS

Well, he mentioned that he is extra cautious and wants to make sure, that under no circumstances a shot can be fired unintentionally. In this case, it does not matter whether this is logical or not. A safety notch helps w/ a pistol and w/ a revolver one can overdo it. If one feels safer, why not? Decrease of capacity vs. not carrying at all?

All modern gas-alarm revolvers have transfer bar or other similar passive firing pin blocking mechanism. It not illogical, it is idiotism to carry a revolver with an empty chamber. Who suggest such thing, do not have even the most basic knowledge of guns.

Some would argue, it is no good to carry a pistol because revolvers can impossibly fail and if a cartridge does not fire, you can pull the trigger anyway without wrecking the slide... You can call it however you wish to, but it does not change the fact, that if you do not trust the safeties or that the hammer spur really does not rest on the primer, what else would you say or suggest? Would you say "you are dumb, suck it up" rather than "beeing extra cautious even if it is not necessary"?

Selbst 1865 gab es schon länger Revolver, die - noch mit Perkussion - Sicherheitsrasten hatten. Ändert das was daran? Oder soll nun gesagt werden, dass man also nur die Wahl zwischen "das is unnötig, du doof, also nicht Führen" oder "ich mach mir keine Gedanken, passt schon" hat?

Ist kein Platz für den Mittelweg, auch wenn es absolut nicht nötig ist, wenn man übervorsichtig ist und trotz aller Sicherheitssysteme im Revolver sagt "ne, lieber unnötig sicher als wenn alle Stricke reißen", um am Anfang sich mal daran zu gewöhnen und später dann den Sicherheitsfunktionen zu vertrauen? Was is denn die Alternative? Nicht Führen?

No Shopping, please, gilmore

Zitat von mistermister

Some still not fully understand the functioning of their gun and those are the ones that shouldn't carry anyway. ;^)

+1